|
หัวเรื่อง:ไม่มีชื่อไทย (ชื่ออังกฤษ : The Comparison of Implementation of Rural
Development by Agricultural Extension System at
Grassroots Level between Thailand and China) ผู้เขียน:Ming Zhan, ดร.พัฒนา สุขประเสริฐ, รองศาสตราจารย์, Mulliga Khewan, Ubolwan Arayaphong, Sawat Virawongprom, Chainanarong Tongpuy สื่อสิ่งพิมพ์:pdf AbstractThis study focused on the comparison of implementation of agricultural extension to rural development
between Thailand and China. Thailand is distinguished from China in terms of approaches to implementation
of agricultural extension. The noticeable distinction lies in that alternatives chosen by Thailand are public,
participatory approach and need oriented way, while those chosen by China are mixed public and private,
top-down, technology driven way. However, the conventional extension methods such as demonstration, mass
media are still the major choice both in Thailand and China. Agricultural Technology Transfer and Service
Center (ATTC), as the fundamental operational extension institution at grassroots level in Thailand, firstly
makes developing plans, and then conducts the extension activities by steering committee under the help
of facilitators in participatory way. ATTC conducts various well-planned training activities through learning
by systematic observations, training by successful farmer and specialists by demonstration, mass media, and
live project, but most important learning process is highly emphasized to build up the farmer's capacity
of self-reliance. Meanwhile Township Agricultural Techniques Extension Station (TATES) is the fundamental,
operational extension agency at grassroots level in China, which implements extension programmes under
the top-down direction. It is noticeable that it is flexible, diversified extension approaches co-exist in China,
such as "Technical contracts between extension agents and farmer households", "Technique and agricultural
input combination approach", "Extension by Technical Association in the village", "the company-led
extension", other than the conventional approach. Those approaches are really practical to accommodate the |